IN FOCUS
Beyond the Cloud: Assessing the Impact of Data Center Expansion on Resources and Communities
Data centers, which house the high-speed servers that power our phone and computer activities, currently consume about 4% of U.S. electricity, with the latest projections suggesting that demand could double or triple by 2028. This increase reflects the rapid growth of artificial intelligence and cloud computing services, especially given that technologies like AI model training are significantly more energy-intensive than traditional computing processes.
Data Center Alley in Northern Virginia
Northern Virginia exemplifies the data center expansion trend. With its strategic location, well-developed infrastructure, relatively low electricity costs, and favorable zoning policies, the region has become a global hub for data centers.
Loudoun County, Virginia, often dubbed “Data Center Alley,” hosts over 300 data centers and handles an estimated (and stunning) 70% of global internet traffic. While other states are attracting development, they remain far behind Northern Virginia in scale and impact. In fact, it houses 15% of global hyperscale capacity, surpassing other hubs like Beijing, Dublin, and Silicon Valley.
Land Use Challenges
Beyond energy demand, data centers have a significant impact on land use. They require large tracts of land, access to reliable power grids, and robust infrastructure. These facilities, often several hundred thousand square feet big, are located near residential or mixed-use areas, sparking conflicts over zoning, environmental impact, and community aesthetics. This topic was the focus of a recent webinar co-hosted by the Environmental Law Institute (ELI) and Network for Digital Economy and Environment.
Jim McElfish, Senior Advisor for Research and Policy at ELI, noted that local governments increasingly face challenges (and community opposition) when making siting and zoning decisions for data centers. He highlighted some drawbacks of these facilities, including that they generate relatively few jobs despite their substantial physical footprint. Moreover, their large-scale industrial design often conflicts with mixed-use areas, consuming space that could otherwise accommodate transit-oriented developments or community-focused projects.
Community Impacts
The physical presence of data centers also affects communities in other ways. Cooling systems, essential for preventing server overheating, rely heavily on water. Globally, data centers are projected to consume 450 million gallons of water daily by 2030, with many concentrated in water-stressed areas. In Loudoun County, Virginia, data center water usage increased 250% between 2019 and 2023, creating tension between data center water demands and residential and agricultural water needs. Water quality can also be affected.
Community concerns about data centers focus on the environmental impact of increased emissions from backup generators, often powered by fossil fuels, and the construction of additional power plants to meet escalating energy demands. Tim Cywinski, Sierra Club of Northern Virginia’s Director of Communications, stressed during the ELI webinar that local governments frequently overlook these cumulative environmental impacts when deciding on locations for data centers, which can adversely affect surrounding communities.
Local Governments Imposing New Restrictions
Local governments grappling with data center siting are taking steps to address these impacts. Fairfax County, Virginia, for instance, recently passed an ordinance prohibiting new data centers within one mile of metro stations to preserve urban development areas. It also imposed new restrictions on the distance of ground equipment from residential properties, requirements for noise studies, and mandates for architectural enhancements to improve visual appeal.
Chandler, Arizona’s data center ordinance outlines strict location and operational protocols for data centers, specifying that they can only be located within Planned Area Development (PAD) zoning districts. It also includes provisions for noise mitigation, public communication requirements, and annual compliance monitoring to minimize community impact.
Repurposing Existing Sites, Federal Lands
Pranava Raparla, a Presidential Innovation Fellow at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Policy/Office of Critical & Emerging Technologies, highlighted the importance and benefits of repurposing existing infrastructure for data centers during the ELI webinar. He discussed initiatives to transform retired and retiring industrial sites, such as coal plants and manufacturing facilities in Energy Communities, into data centers and clean technology hubs, noting these sites have existing grid connections and the communities are hungry for development.
The Biden administration is exploring executive action to use federal lands for data centers and dedicated power plants to supply electricity independently from regional power grids. During the ELI discussion, Raparla noted that DOE’s National Lab sites offer significant opportunities to expand renewable energy, increase grid capacity, and potentially co-locate data centers on these lands.
The Path Forward
Data centers are essential to the digital economy, but rapid growth requires coordinated, strategic planning. Northern Virginia offers key insights into the impacts of data centers nationwide. Addressing energy and land use challenges will require collaboration among tech companies, developers, and local governments, focusing on practical solutions such as repurposing existing infrastructure and land, refining zoning policies, and incorporating community input.
CRE MARKET UPDATE
The Latest Market Updates in the U.S. Commercial Real Estate Industry
Investment Volume Stabilizes
According to CBRE Research, commercial real estate investment volume stabilized at $90 billion in Q3, reflecting a modest 2% decline year-over-year compared to a sharp 49% drop during the same quarter last year (Fig. 1). The slight dip from Q2 was primarily due to limited entity-level transactions in Q3, totaling just $212 million. Over the trailing four quarters, investment volume decreased by 15% year-over-year to $351 billion, marking a slowdown in the trend of larger declines seen over the previous six quarters. Portfolio sales experienced significant growth, increasing by 33% year-over-year to $20 billion, while single-asset sales dipped marginally by 1% to $70 billion.
In Q3, multifamily properties remained the most active investment sector, with volume rising 5% year-over-year to $34 billion (Fig. 2). The industrial and logistics sector ranked second, recording $23 billion in investment volume, a 2% year-over-year decrease. Office investments increased 8% year-over-year to $13 billion, while retail investments fell 28% to $12 billion.
For the trailing four quarters ending in Q3 2024, New York led the market with $28.7 billion in investment volume, closely followed by Los Angeles at $28.6 billion, and Dallas-Ft. Worth at $18 billion (Fig. 3). Among the top 20 markets, South Florida posted the highest growth with a 4.2% increase, trailed by Boston (+2.3%), Philadelphia (+1.9%), and Greater Washington, D.C. (+1.4%).
Private investors dominated Q3 activity, accounting for 59% of the total investment volume, or $53 billion, representing an 8% decrease from the previous year (Fig. 4). Private investors were net buyers, whereas institutional, REIT, and cross-border investors were net sellers. Institutional investment volumes surged 26% year-over-year to $21 billion. However, REITs and public companies saw the steepest decline, down 44% to $5.3 billion, largely driven by last year’s merger between Global Net Lease and Necessity Retail REIT. After five consecutive quarters of declining inbound cross-border investments, Q3 recorded a modest 2% year-over-year increase to $3.9 billion.
Source: CBRE Research, Q3 2024
To view larger images and dive deeper into the data, click on the images above.
Latest Developments
EPA Map Reflects State-by-State Implementation of WOTUS Rules
A new map provided by EPA illustrates which definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) is being followed in each state following the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Sackett v. EPA. While EPA issued a final rulemaking amending the WOTUS rule to comply with Sackett, the question of when a body of water is subject to federal regulation under the Clean Water Act (CWA) remains uncertain due to pending litigation challenging both the content of the revised rule and EPA’s rulemaking procedure.
Currently, 24 states are implementing the WOTUS definition outlined in EPA’s January 2023 (pre-Sackett) rule, while 26 states interpret WOTUS according to the pre-2015 regulatory regime and the Sackett decision. EPA will update the map with current information as it becomes available. The map is for informational purposes only and has no legal implications.
The states and industry groups pursuing legal action argue that EPA undermined Sackett by failing to clearly define “relatively permanent” and “continuous surface connections.” Additionally, they claim that EPA’s decision not to provide a notice-and-comment period violates the Administrative Procedure Act. The outcomes of these legal challenges will have significant implications for the jurisdictional reach of the CWA and how states may interpret it.
You can listen to the ERIS podcast about the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Sackett here.
Draft EPA Framework to Guide Agency Employees on Assessing Cumulative Impacts
EPA recently released a draft framework – the “Interim Framework for Advancing Consideration of Cumulative Impacts” – that provides guidance to agency employees on how to consider the “cumulative impacts” of pollution in their programmatic work and engage with local communities on those issues. The goal is to help regulators determine the sum of impacts from different types of environmental stressors on a community’s quality of life.
Guiding principles described in the framework include:
- Using cumulative impacts assessments to improve human health, quality of life, and the environment.
- Focusing on the disproportionate and adverse burden of cumulative impacts.
- Assessing and addressing cumulative impacts based on a “fit-for-purpose” approach.
- Engaging communities and incorporating their experience into assessments.
- Using available data and information to make decisions and act on those decisions.
- Operationalizing and integrating processes for considering and addressing cumulative impacts.
While environmental professionals can expect EPA to incorporate the framework into its decision-making processes, the framework is not a mandate. The agency says it will integrate cumulative impacts into its processes and programs “as appropriate, feasible, and consistent with applicable law.” Additionally, due to a permanent injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana on August 22, 2024, EPA will not require any cumulative impact requirements in Louisiana. Read more about EPA’s enforcement efforts, evolving environmental justice regulations, and best practices for environmental professionals in a recent ERIS Originals’ article.
EPA is accepting public comment on the draft framework until February 19, 2025.
EPA Publishes PFAS Strategic Roadmap Progress Report
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a new report describing the progress made toward meeting the commitments outlined in the agency’s 2021 PFAS Strategic Roadmap. The roadmap describes actions EPA will take to safeguard communities from PFAS contamination and sets timelines for those goals.
Achievements included in this year’s report include:
- Establishing national PFAS drinking water standards,
- Designating PFOA and PFOS as Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) hazardous substances,
- Releasing updated interim guidance on destroying and disposing of PFAS and certain PFAS-containing materials, and
- Allocating more than $10 billion from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to address PFAS and other emerging contaminants in drinking water.
Last year’s progress report can be found here.
GAO Report Makes Recommendations to EPA on Managing Climate Risks at Hazardous Waste Facilities
EPA should do more to address climate change-related risks to hundreds of hazardous waste facilities across the country, according to a November 14, 2024, report issued by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO).
Specifically, the GAO found that more than 700 hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities (about 68 percent) are located in areas affected by climate change-related hazards, including flooding, wildfires, storm surge, and/or sea level rise. It is currently unclear whether EPA has authority under existing regulations to manage these climate risks.
While EPA has issued guidance on managing climate risks through facility permit requirements, agency officials have not provided training or technical assistance to help states and facilities implement this guidance, the GAO reports. In fact, some states and facilities may wait for clarifying regulations to ensure the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) legally permits such management actions. Additionally, EPA hasn’t taken any action on managing climate risks as part of compliance and enforcement efforts.
“By issuing guidance to regions, states, and facilities on how to manage climate risks, along with providing data, tools, and training, EPA could better ensure these risks are managed sufficiently and that regions, states, and facilities have the direction and information necessary to do so,” the GAO reports.
State Developments
Oregon Proposes Listing PFOA and PFOS as Hazardous Substances
The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) proposed including PFOA and PFOS in the state's definition of hazardous substances after EPA added those two PFAS to the federal definition. The definition of hazardous substances is a fundamental part of the state’s contaminated sites cleanup program because DEQ has the authority to require investigation, removal, and remedial actions when listed hazardous substances are discovered on a property. Oregon’s Hazardous Substance Remedial Action rules at OAR 340-122-0115 reference the federal hazardous substances list as of the date the rule was last updated in 2006, and this amendment will align Oregon’s regulations with the current federal hazardous substances list, which was updated in May 2024. This amendment would not, by default, require action from responsible parties. Rather, DEQ would have the authority to require investigation, risk assessment, and remediation where necessary.
Colorado Revises Petroleum Storage Tank Regulations
Recent comprehensive amendments to state regulations include substantive changes to the corrective action and remediation rules. The revised regulations require reporting for suspected and confirmed releases for aboveground and underground storage tanks, including when tests show a failure in the secondary containment systems. Similarly, in the remediation section, added provisions require more detailed reports. There are also amendments to the Tier 1 risk-based screening levels (RBSLs) table; most surficial soil values are updated, and all the BTEXN (a group of chemicals that includes benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, and naphthalene compounds) now have RBSLs for soil vapor. There is also a newly added table subsection, Gasoline Additives, which lists four additional chemicals of concern. Other changes include the adoption and incorporation-by-reference of new professional standards (e.g., Association for Materials Protection and Performance and International Standardized Profile 0169), more stringent installer certification provisions, and the recodification and consolidation of the bulk-storage assessment rules. All the changes went into effect on January 1, 2025.
PFAS Disclosure Now Required for New Hampshire Property Transactions
New Hampshire’s amended disclosure law now requires sellers and their agents to include PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) in the list of potential contaminants that must be disclosed before finalizing a property purchase and sale agreement. This mandate applies to all real property, including buildings, and also covers radon, arsenic, and lead. The PFAS disclosure is required for all real estate sales in New Hampshire, regardless of whether the specific property has been confirmed to be contaminated with PFAS. The statutorily prescribed notice gives basic information about the sources, warns buyers that PFAS have been detected in wells throughout the state at “levels that exceed federal and/or state advisories or standards,” and states that testing “by an accredited laboratory can measure PFAS levels and inform” on water filtration systems if needed. The changes became effective on January 1, 2025.
Thank you to STP ComplianceEHS for contributing the articles under State Developments in this edition.
LENDERS' CORNER
Trending Toward Optimism in 2025
As we put 2024 behind us, let’s look forward to what 2025 can hold for CRE markets. One word continues to define the times – uncertainty. If you were to ask a few different people what their expectations are for the coming year, you would likely receive very different answers.
Those with a more optimistic view will point to lower interest rates dramatically impacting the number of transactions. On the surface, this sounds reasonable. However, it also highlights just how far transactions have dropped. To put this into perspective, in 2021, the total CRE market was about $900B. Last year, it was closer to $300B. Most forecasts point towards the $400-$450B mark for 2025. While that would be significant growth, there’s still a long climb back.
It’s fair to expect transaction levels to increase in 2025, but that is only part of the equation. Those with a more negative outlook feel there still could be a reckoning coming. Their view is that lower interest rates will not, in fact, have a dramatic impact and you can only ‘kick the can down the road’ for so long. There is plenty of data to support this perspective as well. More than 10% of Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities loans are delinquent. Loan modifications, the tool banks use to “extend and pretend,” were up 61% for banks with assets between $100B-$700B in 2024 per Moody’s. Many have been predicting a flood of foreclosures as a result. However, this loan modification strategy seems to be working, and while delinquencies are rising, they are still well short of the numbers we saw during the global financial crisis of 2007 and 2008.
As for me, I’m leaning toward optimism. Market sentiment has shifted toward the positive side of things. With increased stability, we should see more transactions, and lenders can feel more confident in their valuations. This stability should also help lessen the blow of delinquencies and loan modifications, as both lenders and borrowers feel more comfortable with the asset's price.
One final word of caution: the rising price of property insurance will undoubtedly impact the number of transactions we see. This variable will be interesting to monitor throughout the year. Keep an eye out for more from ERIS on the subject in the coming months.
Committee E50 Set to Meet in Toronto and Atlanta in 2025
ASTM’s Committee E50 on Environmental Assessment, Risk Management, and Corrective Action meets twice yearly to discuss and develop industry best practices and voluntary standards. The April 2025 committee week is set for April 7-10 in Toronto, home of ERIS’ Canadian headquarters, and the October session takes place October 6-8 in Atlanta, Georgia. Committee week gatherings are essential for environmental due diligence and risk management professionals, as they focus on continuously improving and refining important protocols for commercial real estate transactions. With approximately 1,000 members and six technical subcommittees overseeing over 93 standards, E50 committee events offer valuable opportunities for networking and collaboration. ERIS looks forward to connecting with our clients and colleagues during the 2025 committee week meetings.
FEATURED ERIS PRODUCT
Figure Creator Tool: Your Report Figures. Your Brand.
Environmental professionals use ERIS’ Figure Creator tool to create figures and photo logs for their reports. The Figure Creator tool saves time and staff resources by easily assembling report figures and appendices. Images can be cropped, annotated, titled, and sorted. Perfect figures can be created using historical imagery, maps, site plans, and photos.
Recent enhancements provide more flexibility and control. Users can now choose from built-in templates and upload their company logo to brand images, rotate and sort photos, and upload spatial files (KMZ/KML) to create figures that present unique and customized attributes on the site map.
Figure Creator is accessed through ERIS Xplorer, the interactive layering and analysis platform included with every ERIS Database Report order. All ERIS platforms sync together:
-
- Seamlessly integrate the photos captured on-site via ERIS Mobile (or elsewhere) so they become part of a report/appendix.
- Users of ERIS’ Scriva report writer: Images and photo logs created using Figure Creator flow to the Scriva platform.
You can learn more here.
Spotlight On
Special Profile: Srishtee (Tina) Appadoo, Director, Research and Data
Tina joined ERIS in 2016 as a data analyst. With a background in environmental geoscience, she was a volunteer GIS technician at the University of Toronto before joining the team.
Her dedication and drive have propelled her into roles of greater responsibility at ERIS. Recently promoted to Director of Research and Data, she leads the team that ensures ERIS delivers the most accurate data and provides valuable support for clients. Tina works closely with her team to enhance the data processing pipeline and upholds the highest standards. Tina approaches her work enthusiastically, “every day is a new day, and there is never a lack of interesting work for us.”
Tina’s commitment to the industry is evident. She has obtained licenses and certifications in the environmental industry, including Phase I training, and is a certified Environmental Professional in Canada. She presents at industry events, most recently at the Environmental Bankers Association’s annual conference in September 2024 on “The Evolving Landscape of PFAS.”
“I have had great colleagues and mentors throughout my years at ERIS. One amazing colleague who has had a significant role in my growth here is Ian Reyes. As our Lead Data Engineer, Ian has exceptional technical skills, vision, and the ability to easily explain complex concepts.”
In her spare time, Tina taps into her creative side, often trying new crafting projects with her toddler. Proficient in four languages, she enjoys bonding with people from diverse backgrounds and learning more about their cultures.
Upcoming Events
Feb 3-6, Nashville, TN: Join the ERIS Team at the Environmental Bankers Association’s 2025 Annual Conference.
Feb 3-7, Anchorage, AK: Join Maggie Losoya at the Alaska Forum on the Environment.
Mar 3-4, Tempe, AZ: Join Melissa Perkins-Nelson and Frank Dickerson at the EPAZ Annual Conference.
Mar 26-27, New Brunswick, NJ: Join Ashley Miller at LSRPA's NJ Site Remediation Conference 2025.
Apr 3, Clemson, SC: Join Ashley Miller at Clemson University’s Hydrogeology Symposium.
Apr 7-10, Toronto, ON: Join the ERIS Team at ASTM E50 Committee Week including as sponsor of the Social Apr 9.