ERIS' infoHUB: News, updates, podcasts,
blogs and videos - ALL IN ONE PLACE.

1-866-517-5204 Sign In / Order US

Quarterly Newsletter Q3 2025

IN FOCUS

Wildfire Risk Part 1: Expanding the Scope of Environmental Due Diligence

Wildfire property losses have increased dramatically over the past several decades in the United States. That’s largely due to urban sprawl, with increased construction near fire-prone wildlife areas, and climate change extending fire seasons and intensifying drought conditions that have turned certain regions into tinderboxes. Wildfires in urban settings can trigger the release of hazardous materials from buildings, like asbestos, PFAS, and heavy metals.

Structural wildfire debris typically consists of ash, contaminated soils, metals, concrete, and hazardous household items like plastics, paints, batteries, cleaners, and pesticides. Studies suggest that the materials burned in urban wildfires contain more toxic chemicals than wildfires that consume wood and other natural materials. For example, burning plastic waste generates 20 times more particulate matter than other burned materials, causing inflammation and respiratory illnesses.

Considering Wildfire Risk in Site Assessments

The release of these hazardous materials demonstrates the need for fire-specific property evaluations. In fact, there is a growing trend to incorporate natural disaster risks, such as wildfires, into environmental site assessments.

Evaluating wildfire risk is tricky. While the ASTM E1527-21 standard for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments does not explicitly consider wildfires a “recognized environmental condition" (REC) that requires investigation due to the potential contamination following these events, real estate professionals should strongly consider wildfire risk during environmental due diligence in regions of the country impacted by wildfires.

As the frequency and severity of wildfires increase, consultants can use localized risk information on hazards linked to climate change to clarify their expectations and inform decision-making. Another crucial question for consultants to consider is property use, which could pinpoint specific wildfire release risks. The type of contaminants present on the property should guide the environmental site assessment.

Increased Liability Concerns

Urban property owners face increased liability in wildfire-prone areas due to the high risk of releasing hazardous substances into soil and water bodies. Some industries are particularly impacted by increased wildfire risks, especially construction contractors, environmental contractors, and utility and energy companies. Determining responsibility largely depends on who or what caused the fire. However, property owners can still be held responsible for pollution from their burning building, even if they did not start the fire.

It’s also important to keep in mind that contamination is not limited to the footprint of the burned structures; smoke and ash can easily spread contaminants across property lines, creating broader liability concerns. Soil sampling after a wildfire can help identify these issues.

Wildfire Response and Remediation

FEMA is the lead federal agency for wildfire response under the Stafford Act, coordinating recovery and debris removal efforts. Through its Public Assistance Program, FEMA provides funding for wildfire debris cleanup and related activities. It issues mission assignments to federal partners such as the EPA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to carry out specialized roles, including hazardous material removal and debris management. FEMA also sets eligibility rules that determine what wildfire debris removal costs are reimbursable, including distinctions between residential and commercial coverage.

Wildfire cleanup follows a two-phase model under FEMA’s Public Assistance Program.

  • Phase 1 involves household hazardous waste removal, including batteries, propane tanks, solvents, and asbestos-containing materials. EPA usually leads when mission-assigned by FEMA, but state agencies such as California’s Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) often provide support. For smaller events, state environmental agencies may take the lead.
  • Phase 2 involves debris removal, structural demolition, contaminated soil scraping, hazard tree removal, and confirmation sampling. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers typically takes the lead, often with support from the state.

The 2025 Los Angeles wildfires resulted in the largest wildfire hazardous materials cleanup in EPA’s history. However, following the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires, FEMA did not agree to conduct additional soil testing, and the California government has not stepped in to fill that need. This reflects an ongoing tension surrounding state and federal emergency management jurisdiction, highlighting the importance of environmental due diligence for properties involved in or near wildfire events.

Cleanup Standards and Protocols

Federal standards guiding wildfire remediation include:

California provides an example of state-level coordination, with CalRecycle overseeing debris removal, DTSC establishing soil screening levels, and local agencies requiring air monitoring and erosion controls.

These frameworks outline the procedures for characterizing, handling, and disposing of debris and hazardous substances to ensure regulatory compliance. Experts, including experienced environmental professionals, can assist owners in safely removing and disposing of hazardous materials from their property. Note that it’s difficult to assess the costs of removal and disposal of fire debris.

Cleanup Costs – Who Pays?

While wildfire cleanup costs vary depending on property type, debris volume, and the presence of hazardous materials, California offers some examples. Cleanup after the 2018 Camp Fire exceeded $1.35 billion, with contracts projecting nearly $1.7 billion for 14,700 parcels. More recently, estimates for the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires place total damages, including cleanup and rebuilding, at $250 to $275 billion.

While residential cleanup is often funded through FEMA and state partners like CalRecycle, at no direct cost to homeowners who opt in, commercial properties are generally excluded from some aspects of cleanup (as it is expected they have insurance to cover wildfire-related costs). For example, FEMA notes that demolition of commercial structures is “generally ineligible”. Los Angeles County confirmed that commercial sites must arrange for private cleanup.

However, California secured limited federal approval for some mixed-use properties. Specifically, FEMA agreed to include small businesses and multi-family residential properties in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) debris removal program on a case-by-case basis.

But the governor’s office reiterated that commercial cleanup is “typically the responsibility of property owners.”

For lenders, developers, and property owners, this means that hazardous materials remediation is often a direct cost exposure and one that is not always offset by insurance, which frequently excludes environmental liabilities. This is especially true given that wildfire cleanup issues, including debris removal and remediation, have changed the way underwriters assess risks in fire-prone areas. In addition, these at-risk properties are becoming increasingly difficult to insure.

The New Realities of Wildfire Risk

While wildfires are not explicitly a recognized environmental condition in standard site assessments, their potential to release hazardous substances and create costly cleanup obligations makes them a growing concern in property transactions. For owners, buyers, lenders, and developers, considering wildfire risk, site history, and cleanup records offers a clearer picture of potential liabilities and helps avoid unexpected liability and financial exposure. As wildfire events become more frequent and severe, incorporating these factors into due diligence is not yet standard practice, but it is an increasingly prudent safeguard in acquisition, financing, and redevelopment decisions.

Coming soon – Part 2… Identifying the potential liabilities is only the first step. Equally critical is understanding how resilience measures, regulatory frameworks, and redevelopment strategies can reduce risk and support long-term recovery and resilience. These issues, including wildfire-related building codes, resilience planning, and industry best practices, will be the focus of Part 2 in the series.

CRE MARKET UPDATE

The Latest Market Updates in the U.S. Commercial Real Estate Industry (Q2 2025)

Investment Activity Continues to Improve

According to CBRE Research, in Q2, commercial real estate investment volume increased by 13% year-over-year to $96 billion. Single-asset sales grew by 15% year-over-year, reaching $78 billion, while portfolio sales increased by 3% to $18 billion (Fig. 1).

During this same time period, multifamily properties remained the leading investment sector with $33 billion, but this represented a 19% decrease year-over-year (Fig. 2). The industrial and logistics sector ranked second again, recording $22 billion in investment volume, a 2% year-over-year increase. The retail and office sectors had the strongest growth in investment volumes. Office investment rose 50% year-over-year to $18 billion in Q2, while retail investment increased by 31% to $14 billion.

For the trailing four quarters ending in Q2 2025, New York continued to lead the market with $37 billion, followed by Los Angeles at $30 billion, and Dallas-Ft. Worth at $24 billion (Fig. 3). Among the top 20 markets, Seattle had the largest year-over-year increase of 116%, followed by Orlando (50%) and the San Francisco Bay Area (45%).

Private investors had the largest share of investment volume for the fourth consecutive quarter, accounting for $60 billion, 62% of Q2 volume, representing a 16% increase from a year ago (Fig. 4). Institutional investment volume fell by 39% from a year ago to $17 billion, accounting for 17% of total volume. Only REITs/public companies were net buyers in Q2, while private, institutional, and cross-border investors were net sellers.

Source: CBRE Research, Q2 2025

Figure 1 - Commercial real estate investment volume Q2 2025

Figure 2 - Investment volume by sector, Q2 2025 vs Q2 2024

Figure 3 - Top 20 markets for trailing-four-quarter investment volume & YOY change

Figure 4 - Investment volume by buyer, Q2 2025 vs. Q2 2024

To view larger images and dive deeper into the data, click on the images above.

Latest Developments

EPA Retains CERCLA Designation, Revisits Drinking Water Standards

After months of speculation about the status of PFAS regulations under the Trump administration, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently announced that it will retain the Biden administration's 2024 final rule that designates PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups are challenging the designation, and Trump’s EPA had requested multiple stays in the legal proceeding while it reviewed the designation. Now, the agency has moved to lift the abeyance and formally defend the designation. The rule took effect July 8, 2024.

Change in Water Standards

The Biden administration also established the first national PFAS drinking water standards under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Now, Trump’s EPA has asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, where a lawsuit challenging the standards has been in a prolonged abeyance, to vacate four of the six drinking water limits established under Biden:

  • HFPO-DA (GenX)
  • PFNA
  • PFHxS, and
  • The Hazard Index approach for PFAS mixtures (including PFBS).

Trump’s EPA is arguing that the Biden administration violated the rulemaking process in establishing those four standards. The PFOA and PFOS standards would remain in place, but the agency will delay enforcing the limits until 2031. EPA initially announced its intent to regulate PFOA and PFOS in drinking water in 2020 during Trump’s first term.

Managing a Fragmented PFAS Landscape

These rollbacks and delays create uncertainty for the regulated community, setting the stage for a likely divergence between federal and state regulations as states continue to implement their own PFAS regulations. For example, Maine has adopted stricter drinking water limits and a broad PFAS product law, while New York has expanded its PFAS bans in apparel and other goods. North Carolina has also established interim maximum allowable concentrations for certain PFAS in groundwater. These developments underscore the ongoing federal-state regulatory patchwork that companies must monitor to remain compliant and effectively manage PFAS-related risks.

Managing Legionella Risk in Commercial Real Estate

Legionnaires' disease is a severe form of pneumonia commonly spread in large buildings where it more easily grows in water systems. Although Legionella is not a new concern, the rise in cases signals the importance of due diligence for commercial real estate professionals.

A recent high-profile example occurred in Harlem, where more than 100 people contracted Legionella. The source of the outbreak was traced back to cooling towers atop a city-run hospital in Harlem and a nearby construction site. A lawsuit alleges that up to 20 people died from the outbreak, contradicting the city’s official count of seven deaths.

The outbreak occurred despite New York having some of the most stringent Legionella compliance requirements in place. For example, building owners and operators must register each cooling tower with the New York State Department of Health. Facilities must also maintain a site-specific maintenance program and plan that aligns with ASHRAE 188 and includes detailed procedures for regular cleaning, disinfection, and corrective action if elevated bacterial levels are detected.

Note, however, that not all states and municipalities have Legionella testing regulations, which can lead to building operators failing to implement proper precautions.

Why Legionella Cases Are Increasing

Rising temperatures increase the risk of Legionella outbreaks. As temperatures rise, air conditioning usage sets the stage for bacteria to spread. Cities in the Northeast and Midwest are particularly at risk with hotter temperatures and aging infrastructure. Extreme weather events, such as flooding, may also increase risks by carrying Legionella from natural sources into drinking water systems where conditions allow the bacteria to grow.

Even smart building practices can lead to outbreaks. Water conservation methods used in green buildings can elevate the risk of Legionella, potentially leading to water stagnation and creating ideal conditions for the bacteria to thrive. This underscores the importance of green building managers to deploy Internet of Things (IoT) technology to monitor water temperatures and stay ahead of outbreaks.

Risk Mitigation and Best Practices

Mitigation and prevention strategies are crucial for commercial real estate professionals. The CDC recommends a seven-step water management program to minimize the risk of Legionella.
Other best practices include:

  • maintaining proper water temperatures, pH, and water chemistries; and
  • maintaining proper concentrations of water treatment chemicals such as rust inhibitors, anti-scaling agents, and biocides if necessary.

Additionally, innovative technologies give operators state-of-the-art monitoring tools, offering more efficient alternatives to labor-intensive processes. IoT systems equipped with sensors can continuously track water temperature, flow rates, and chlorine levels, giving facilities managers real-time data to respond quickly to unsafe conditions.

Digital Twins: Moving from Concept to Practice

A digital twin is a virtual representation of a physical object, process, or concept that can be used to simulate future outcomes and gain a deeper understanding of how something operates in real life. This technology can be useful in the environmental due diligence space because it creates a live geospatial model that fuses site history, current conditions, and forward-looking risk into one workspace.

Earlier this year, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released a new report on digital twins, finding that the modeling technology is advantageous but proprietary, making integration and file sharing difficult. The NIST recommends adopting standards to ensure compatibility and for cybersecurity reasons.

Environmental Due Diligence and Digital Twins

Here are a few specific examples of how digital twin technology could be used in the environmental due diligence context:

  • Potential buyers gathering initial site information to determine whether they want to purchase a property can build a geospatial twin of the parcel and surroundings with zoning, flood, heat, contamination, and other relevant records.
  • The twin could potentially be used during a Phase I environmental site assessment (ASTM E1527-21) to organize records review, reconnaissance, and interviews.
  • Digital twins can enhance Phase II site investigations with detailed 3D environmental modeling. For example, this technology allows consultants to predict the path and concentration of contaminants.
  • The twin can serve as a living compliance record with engineering controls and Internet of Things (IoT) monitoring.
  • It can also simplify climate and physical risk diligence by integrating hazard projections to align with ASTM E3429‑24.

Real estate, insurance, and engineering firms are already demonstrating the value of digital twins in everyday operations. For example, JLL adopted Matterport’s digital twin technology to reduce real estate transaction times by up to 85%, using immersive 3D virtual tours to accelerate leasing and sales. Swiss Re partnered with One Concern to model catastrophe and business interruption risk using twin‑like hazard and exposure data platforms. And Tetra Tech integrates real‑time field conditions, predictive maintenance, and monitoring through its Digital Water platform.

State Developments

Arizona Introduces Non-Owner Remediator Liability Protection

The Arizona Legislature passed several bills this year to modernize its environmental cleanup procedures. One of those, AZ H 2128, adds a new “prospective remediator” category to the state’s cleanup statute that operates similarly to the state’s Prospective Purchaser Agreement (PPA) program. This change provides liability relief for parties who want to remediate a site without purchasing it. The law became effective September 26, 2025.

Similar to the approach for prospective purchasers, this new provision establishes a formal framework under the Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund that allows a party to enter an agreement with the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to conduct and complete a remedial investigation and feasibility study with respect to a site or portion of a site, on the annual priority list.

Prospective remediators then are eligible to receive state remediation funds, a written liability release, and a covenant not to sue. They may also seek a court order for approval of a settlement that includes immunity from contribution claims for any potential liability for contamination listed by ADEQ or CERCLA.

Texas Passes Law to Promote Conversion of Commercial Properties to Residential

The Texas legislature has adopted changes to the state’s land use planning law that make it easier to convert commercial properties for residential uses (S.B. 2477). The law aims to address two conflicting issues facing Texas cities – high vacancy rates in commercial office buildings and costly, limited housing options near job centers. The amendments streamline office-to-residential conversions and prohibit municipalities from imposing fees, studies, or extra design restrictions in the planning process. The streamlined planning processes are available for properties located in larger urban areas (cities with a population greater than 150,000 located in a county with a population greater than 300,000). Properties located near industrial sites, airports, and military bases are not eligible. The legislation took effect September 1, 2025.

Major Improvements in Florida’s Brownfields Redevelopment Laws

The Florida legislature amended the state’s Brownfields Redevelopment Act this year, affecting multiple sections of Florida Statutes, Chapter 376. Collectively, these comprehensive changes focus on easing requirements and affording more flexibility for the redevelopment of complex and multiple sites. New definitions for “Brownfield” and “Brownfield site” (§79), identify them as real property in a brownfield site rehabilitation agreement and remove references that specify them as commercial, industrial, or contaminated sites. The recission of the mapping requirement (formerly at §303) clarifies how land use and zoning maps apply, including in situations under which persons responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation lack control of the site. The law also establishes a direct path to “No Further Action” status for brownfield sites within larger contaminated properties (§81); prohibiting regulators from denying completion orders once cleanup standards are met. Finally, multiple changes to eligibility criteria and liability protection (§82) expand redevelopment opportunities for Superfund sites and make it easier to obtain state liability protection. The amendments took effect on July 1, 2025.

Thank you to STP ComplianceEHS for contributing the articles under State Developments.

LENDERS' CORNER

The Evolving Use of AI for Lenders

Dave Colonna, Director, Lender Solutions, ERIS

Banks are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) to increase efficiency across multiple departments. According to a recent survey, more than 80% of financial service professionals believe they will fall behind competitors if they do not integrate AI. JPMorgan Chase just announced their plans to become the world's first AI-powered mega bank.

Most customers have already interacted with automated chatbots and virtual assistants for routine banking tasks. Behind the scenes, AI is heavily used in fraud detection, risk management, and regulatory compliance.

Fraud departments are using AI algorithms to detect anomalies and suspicious transactions that may be fraudulent. Having these systems in place allows the bank to monitor transactions in real-time, preventing financial crime and customer losses.

The implementation of AI for credit and underwriting purposes enables banks to review thousands of documents in seconds in the credit review process. This helps financial institutions make faster decisions on loan files and could enhance their ability to create more comprehensive risk profiles. If used correctly, an AI-based decision engine can instantly accept, deny, or flag a loan application. The data can also be analyzed to provide real-time portfolio monitoring to flag early warning signs of potential defaults.

Use of these tools and technologies in environmental risk departments is still evolving. To date, AI is often used for ESG-related functions, such as climate risk modeling and ESG risk assessments. Vast amounts of data can be compiled from various sources to predict ESG-related risks.

The rapid adoption of new technology always comes with challenges and risks; AI is no different. Data privacy and security are always top of mind for any lending institution. AI handles vast amounts of sensitive information and customer data. Any breach or unauthorized access could lead to significant financial loss and damage to the bank's reputation.

Data quality is also a concern as poor or inaccurate data can lead to unreliable AI outcomes. Overdependence on technology can also make banks vulnerable to technology failures and cyberattacks. Ensuring robust backup systems and disaster recovery plans are in place is essential to mitigate this risk.

Addressing these risks is crucial for banks to fully leverage the advantages of AI while safeguarding against potential downsides.

An upcoming ERIS Risk-E Business podcast will feature a discussion with Jim King, Fifth Third Bank, about how environmental risk management departments are starting to use AI throughout the due diligence process.

ASTM DEVELOPMENTS

New Standard for Climate Adaptation Terminology

ASTM has recently approved a new guide (E3360-25) that standardizes vocabulary related to climate change, including environmental justice, climate resilience, and adaptation. Specifically, the guide is a compilation of definitions and acronyms written in plain language, intended to help stakeholders understand and communicate basic climate concepts using a common vocabulary.

The guide includes terms on a range of climate issues, such as adaptive capacity, financial impacts, greenhouse gas emissions, and extreme weather vulnerability. These definitions will provide a framework that helps communities better understand government proposals and guides consultants responding to changing climate conditions.

The guide was developed by the Climate and Community Subcommittee (E50.07) of ASTM’s E50 Committee on Environmental Assessment, Risk Management, and Corrective Action.

Revised Standard Guide for Brownfields Redevelopment Advances

Subcommittee balloting is underway for the reinstatement and significant revision of the E1984-2025 Standard Guide for Brownfields Redevelopment to reflect current industry best practices and align with federal brownfields guidance, policy, regulations, and statutes. These updates were developed by ASTM’s E50.07 Climate and Community subcommittee after the original standard was allowed to sunset in 2011. Depending on balloting outcomes, the standard could be finalized before the end of the year.

This guide is intended to provide a comprehensive resource detailing the brownfields redevelopment process. It identifies potential impediments to redevelopment and suggests solutions for overcoming these challenges. Specific revisions include:

  • an updated process aligned with EPA guidelines and real estate best practices;
  • a “continuing obligations” section to guide ongoing operations, maintenance, and stewardship of brownfields upon redevelopment;
  • a section on activity and use limitations (engineering and institutional controls);
  • a high-level process to guide users toward other existing ASTM standards and other resources;
  • language addressing climate vulnerability assessments;
  • expanded references and appendices;
  • additional details on insurance mechanisms and limitations; and
  • an expanded stakeholder and community engagement section with additional appendices.

For more information about this guide or to participate as a voting member of ASTM, please contact the work group chair, Danielle Getsinger, at [email protected].

New Standard Guide for Microplastics Under Development

Microplastics are tiny, ubiquitous pieces of plastic (5 millimeters or less) that could pose serious environmental and human health concerns. For that reason, ASTM’s E50 Committee on Environmental Assessment, Risk Management, and Corrective Action has proposed a new standard (WK94491) covering the identification, assessment, and cleanup of microparticles, including microplastics, found in soil, sediment, surface water, and groundwater.

While experts are still learning about the potential adverse effects of exposure to microplastics, WK94491 will compile the most recent findings. The scope of the standard will include methods for identifying microplastics in environmental media and procedures for initial characterization and cleanup. The scope will also include best management practices and related checklists.

The proposed standard is currently under development. For more information or to get involved, please contact Molly Lynyak at [email protected].

FEATURED ERIS PRODUCT

Environmental Lien & AUL Report (ASTM E1527-21 Compliant)

The Environmental Lien (EL) & Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) Report identifies recorded ELs and AULs that may impact a property — an essential part of Phase I Environmental Site Assessments under ASTM E1527-21. The main update from E1527-13 to E1527-21 for this research included a requirement to provide a comprehensive search back to 1980. The prior version (E1527-13) was not explicit in specifying the timeframe that required due diligence.

An EL & AUL report is the compilation of research from direct county record reviews across 3,600+ U.S. jurisdictions. This includes both state and federal records, as well as judicial research (when required). Every EL & AUL report undergoes both AI and human QA/QC verification, allowing for the fastest possible turnaround while ensuring accuracy.

ERIS offers two options:

  • Current Owner EL & AUL Report: This report researches from the date that the current owner purchased the property. This report identifies any environmental liens or activity and use limitations recorded on that property over that period. If this report is ordered, the Environmental Professional (EP) must also review the previous title insurance policy for any recorded ELs or AULs to ensure that the scope of research goes back to 1980.
  • 1980 EL & AUL Report: This search spans the period of 1980 through present to identify all ELs and AULs recorded on that property. With this search, no additional research is needed to meet the ASTM E1527-21 requirements.

ERIS’ EL & AUL Reports deliver in-depth lien research to ensure compliance, limit liability, and give you confidence in your due diligence process.

For more information, please contact your Regional Account Manager.

Spotlight On

Cody DiMauro,
Regional Account Manager,
Northeast Region

Special Profile: Cody DiMauro, Regional Account Manager, Northeast Region

Since joining ERIS just six months ago, Cody has embraced the environmental field with energy and enthusiasm. He was eager for a new challenge after extensive experience providing software solutions to business-to-business clients. Cody reflects that his time at ERIS has been both rewarding and eye-opening. He has gained a strong appreciation for the ways ERIS supports its customers and the breadth of opportunities the Northeast market has to offer.

Cody’s path to ERIS felt like a natural fit. With a family background in commercial real estate that relied on ERIS’ services, he was already familiar with the company’s reputation for quality and reliability. That background made the decision to join the team an easy one.

As a Regional Account Manager, Cody’s days are dynamic and customer-focused. He spends much of his time connecting with clients to understand their needs, hosting product demonstrations, and exploring ways ERIS’ tools can enhance workflows and results. He’s also passionate about uncovering new opportunities and expanding awareness of the company’s solutions across the industry.

For Cody, the highlight of working at ERIS is the people. Even while working remotely, he feels supported, trusted, and part of a highly collaborative culture where colleagues are quick to share insights and lend a hand. That teamwork has been instrumental in helping him get up to speed quickly.

Outside of work, Cody makes the most of the outdoors – whether it’s riding dirt bikes, taking his car to car shows, enjoying the lake with friends, or playing a round of golf.

Connect with Cody DiMauro here.

Upcoming Events

Upcoming Events

Oct 30, Johnston, IA: Join Garrett Rosenbaum at the Environmental Professionals of Iowa Fall Conference.

Nov 6, Scottsdale, AZ: Join Melissa Perkins-Nelson at EPIC’s RemFest.

Dec 3-4, 10-11, Virtual: Join Team ERIS at MSECA’ Annual Environmental Conference.

Dec 9-10, Portland, OR: Join Maggie Losoya at NEBC’s Business & The Environment Conference.

Thank you for reading this issue of ERIS Insider quarterly newsletter. Our next issue will drop in January.